CORD hasn't had the courage to pick up in its recent surge for relevance is that of accountability. Including through the ongoing trials of President Uhuru Kenyatta and Deputy President William Ruto before the International Criminal Court.
WHY??
CORD is undeniably picking up on what seems to be of general
public concern. Insecurity, for instance. The pervasive sense that
everybody who should be responsible for security is out to lunch, with
nobody in charge.
However, CORD has also picked up on what is
arguably not of general public concern — an issue about which the public
is divided roughly down the middle: The last general election and what
needs to be done to ensure the public’s vote means something.
So whether or not a concern resonates with the
public across the board is not CORD’s only criteria for inclusion of an
issue on its agenda. Why not accountability then?
Perhaps it is because CORD — like all political
alliances and coalitions that preceded it — includes among its members
those from whom accountability could also be demanded. History does
repeat itself.
There is no political alliance or coalition in
Kenya today without carry-overs, continuities, from the past — the
colonial-era collaborators may slowly be dying out, but the first
republic’s are still with us, alive and well, scattered across the
Jubilants and CORD alike. Thus, CORD raising accountability would create
yet more rancour amongst its already ill-disciplined troops.
Finally, it may also be that CORD is finding news from the ICC as depressing as the rest of us. The case of William Ruto and Joshua Sang is proceeding — albeit with an ever-diminishing witness list.
Finally, it may also be that CORD is finding news from the ICC as depressing as the rest of us. The case of William Ruto and Joshua Sang is proceeding — albeit with an ever-diminishing witness list.
No comments :
Post a Comment